Skip to main content

Blog

Contract Testing Insights

Quality control guides, regulatory updates, and raw material verification insights for supplement manufacturers, cosmetic brands, and contract manufacturers.

Botanical Identity Testing

Aristolochic Acid in Herbal Supplements: The Carcinogen Your Supplier's COA Won't Catch

Aristolochic acid contamination persists in herbal supply chains through species substitution. Learn how Midwest brands can protect against this Group 1 carcinogen with analytical testing.

Nour Abochama
Read →
NPN/DSHEA Compliance

FSVP Compliance for Botanical Ingredient Importers: What FDA Expects When Your Raw Materials Cross a Border

If you import botanical raw materials, you're likely an FSVP importer under FSMA. Here's what FDA's foreign supplier verification requirements actually demand.

Nour Abochama
Read →
NPN/DSHEA Compliance

Amazon Supplement Testing Requirements in 2026: What Midwest Brands Need from an Analytical Testing Laboratory

Amazon's DSVP now demands ISO 17025-accredited COAs. Here's the exact testing scope, formatting rules, and turnaround strategy Midwest supplement brands need to stay listed.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

CoA Red Flags: What Analytical Testing Labs Look for When a Supplier's Certificate Doesn't Add Up

How experienced analytical testing labs catch falsified or inaccurate Certificates of Analysis — and what 21 CFR Part 111 requires of supplement brands.

Nour Abochama
Read →
NPN/DSHEA Compliance

When Your Raw Material Fails Testing: What 21 CFR Part 111 Actually Allows — and What It Doesn't

A raw material fails incoming testing. Before you retest, understand what 21 CFR Part 111 actually permits — and what retesting patterns FDA investigators flag in warning letters.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

PFAS Contamination in Botanical Raw Materials: What Midwest Supplement Brands Need to Know

PFAS 'forever chemicals' are appearing in botanical raw materials. Here's what analytical testing laboratories find—and what Midwest supplement brands must act on now.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Heavy Metals (ICP-MS)

USP <2232> vs. <232>/<233>: Which Elemental Impurity Standard Actually Applies to Your Botanical Raw Materials

Most botanical supplement COAs reference the wrong USP chapter. Here's the real difference between USP <2232> and <232>/<233> — and how to write specs that hold up.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Herbal Supplement Testing

Lot-to-Lot Variability in Botanical Raw Materials: How to Set Specifications That Don't Create Constant Failures

Most supplement brands set botanical raw material specs from a single COA. Here's how analytical testing labs help you build defensible variability baselines.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

Adaptogen Raw Material Testing: The Authentication Failures in Your Ashwagandha, Rhodiola, and Ginseng Supply Chain

Ashwagandha, rhodiola, and ginseng raw materials fail authentication more often than brands expect. Here's what analytical testing laboratories find.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Stability Studies

Retest Dates vs. Expiry Dates for Herbal Raw Materials: What Your Stability Protocol Should Actually Include

Confused by retest dates on botanical CoAs? Learn which stability tests matter — and when retesting is legally required under DSHEA and 21 CFR 111.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Microbiology (USP <61>/<62>)

Collagen Powders and Microbial Risk: What USP <61> and <62> Testing Reveals About Animal-Derived Raw Materials

Collagen's animal origin creates a unique microbial risk profile. Learn what USP <61> and <62> testing finds — and what supplier COAs regularly miss.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Herbal Supplement Testing

Hidden Allergens in Botanical Supplements: What Analytical Testing Labs Find in Raw Materials Under FSMA

The FASTER Act added sesame as the 9th major allergen in 2023 — and it covers dietary supplements. Here's what analytical testing labs find in botanical raw materials.

Nour Abochama
Read →
NPN/DSHEA Compliance

What 21 CFR Part 111 Actually Requires for Raw Material Identity Testing—And Why Most Supplement Brands Fall Short

21 CFR §111.75 requires scientifically valid identity testing for every botanical lot—supplier COAs aren't enough. Here's what compliant testing looks like.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Stability Studies

Designing a Stability Protocol for Botanical Supplements: What an Analytical Testing Laboratory Needs From You to Get It Right

Learn how to design a defensible stability protocol for herbal supplements under 21 CFR Part 111 — what an analytical testing laboratory needs to execute it.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Microbiology (USP <61>/<62>)

Passing TAMC/TYMC Isn't Enough: The USP <62> Gap That Gets Herbal Supplement Brands in Trouble

Most supplement brands stop at TAMC/TYMC enumeration. Here's why USP <62> specified organism testing is the step your analytical testing laboratory can't skip.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Herbal Raw Materials: What the FDA Guidance and EU Limits Mean for Your Testing Plan

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are a real contamination risk in chamomile, echinacea, and mint. Here's what an analytical testing laboratory needs to screen for.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

7 Red Flags on a Supplier COA That Should Send Your Raw Materials to an Analytical Testing Laboratory

Most supplement brands accept supplier COAs at face value. Here are 7 warning signs that should send your raw materials to an analytical testing laboratory.

Nour Abochama
Read →
Adulteration Screening

Why Pesticide Residue Screening Catches What Your Botanical Supplier's CoA Misses

Multi-residue pesticide screening via LC-MS/MS catches what supplier CoAs miss. What Midwest supplement brands need to know about botanical raw material compliance.

Nour Abochama
Read →